Author summary
7% 3 analyzed articles/videos 11,418 analyzed words
BS Summary: These D'Angelo Gore results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 1,776 hits . Analysis detected 12,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,672 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (8,662 of 8,706 authors). This D'Angelo Gore is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. D'Angelo Gore
Author details
Total words: 45,672
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 0.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles45.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst