Publication summary
95% 447 analyzed articles/videos 182,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FoxBusiness results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 107,648 hits . Analysis detected 1,004,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 871,094 analyzed words across 447 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 66% (190 of 551 publications). This FoxBusiness is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. FoxBusiness
Publication details
Total words: 871,094
Article count: 447
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score447 analyzed articles871.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst