Author summary
79% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Kazin results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 2,055 hits . Analysis detected 14,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,014 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,587 of 8,852 authors). This Matthew Kazin is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group. Matthew Kazin
Author details
Total words: 14,014
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.2% 13.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst