Topic summary
85% 20 analyzed articles/videos 13,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Politics results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 7,696 hits . Analysis detected 62,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,785 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (15,375 of 23,292 topics). This Presidential Politics is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Presidential Politics
Topic details
Total words: 61,785
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score20 analyzed articles61.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst