Author summary
95% 14 analyzed articles/videos 9,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Widburg results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 10,726 hits . Analysis detected 79,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,978 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (2,151 of 9,061 authors). This Andrea Widburg is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Andrea Widburg
Author details
Total words: 43,978
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles44K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.4% 24.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.9%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst