Publication summary
74% 147 analyzed articles/videos 126,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These newrepublic.com results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 66,808 hits . Analysis detected 534,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 587,355 analyzed words across 147 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (256 of 570 publications). This newrepublic.com is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. newrepublic.com
Publication details
Total words: 587,355
Article count: 147
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score147 analyzed articles587.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst