Author summary
â 33% 1 analyzed article/video 1,757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Nayman results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,098 hits . Analysis detected 3,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 42% (5,429 of 9,242 authors). This Adam Nayman is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Adam Nayman
Author details
Total words: 7,028
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst