Publication summary
91%1 analyzed article/video1,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Atlantic results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 1,772 hits. Analysis detected 6,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (43 of 584 publications). This The Atlantic is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
The Atlantic
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Just Security1%
1%Greenville News1%
93%The Atlantic (selected)5%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%Lookout12%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 4,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 37.6%37.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.4%0.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Publication 6.4%6.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Publication 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 37.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 16.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos