Publication summary
91% 117 analyzed articles/videos 68,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The American Conservative results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 50,536 hits . Analysis detected 399,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 327,469 analyzed words across 117 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 71% (164 of 552 publications). This The American Conservative is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. The American Conservative Publication details
Total words: 327,469
Article count: 117
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score117 analyzed articles327.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst