Author summary
92%1 analyzed article/video923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Hankinson results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 5,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,335 of 9,464 authors). This Simon Hankinson is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Simon Hankinson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%Simon Hankinson (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,692
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.0%18.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.9%11.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.4%9.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos