BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 376 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.2% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,785 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the article peer group.

The White House’s “Ice Maiden” has gotten involved to salvage Donald Trump’s SAVE America Act. 
Chief of staff Susie Wiles made a rare appearance on Capitol Hill Wednesday to implore top Senate Republicans to pass the wildly unpopular voter restriction bill ahead of the midterm elections. 
“This was her attempt to say to [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune and [Senate GOP Whip John] Barrasso [that] ‘A lot is stalled in the Senate. 
SAVE/reconciliation ... nominations ... what can we do?” 
a person familiar with the discussion told Politico via text Thursday. 
Wiles was also interested in discussing efforts to end the filibuster, a Trump priority that the upper chamber has repeatedly rebuked. 
The stalled succession of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was not mentioned, multiple sources told Politico. 
The discussions were “candid” but not immediately productive, according to the unidentified source. 
“Thune basically said: I want to move the president’s agenda whenever it has the votes,” they added. 
Wiles’s visit has been interpreted as a deliberate attempt by the White House to smooth over ruffled feathers and keep the president’s political priorities on track—particularly after White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt put Thune on blast last week, sharing with reporters during a White House press conference that Trump’s patience was  running out  on the SAVE Act. 
“He wants to see as much of the SAVE America Act passed by the August recess,” Leavitt said at the time. 
“He knows that’s what the American people want to see passed.” 
Thune was quick to hit back , bluntly stating that the caucus simply didn’t have the votes. 
That timeline would offer Senate Republicans just five more business days to pass the controversial legislation, which promises to ban mail-in voting and institute new voting policies that would require voters to prove their identities via either a birth certificate or passport in order to access the ballot box. 
“You can’t show how high the importance of this issue is to the president other than bringing in Susie,” a former Trump adviser told Politico. 
“If there is an ability to land it, the president is certainly putting pressure on Susie to land it. 
It’s still an uphill battle.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 3.9%newrepublic.com: 5.3%Confirmation Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.8%newrepublic.com: 2.6%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 10.0%newrepublic.com: 6.6%Framing Effect22.9%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 2.1%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 27.7%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.3%newrepublic.com: 10.7%Negativity Bias27.7%This article: 5.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias5.6%This article: 6.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.5%In-Group Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 16.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.9%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Recency Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 3.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 3.6%newrepublic.com: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 5.1%newrepublic.com: 6.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 7.2%newrepublic.com: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 3.6%newrepublic.com: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.8%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.1%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Anecdotal12.8%This article: 4.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%No True Scotsman4.5%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.5%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 33.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.7%newrepublic.com: 1.7%Unattributed Quote33.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 32.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.2%newrepublic.com: 12.1%Biased Writer Voice32.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.6%newrepublic.com: 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

376 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech327writer words
Selected voice

Karoline Leavitt

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words65% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote-37.9 ptsWriter: 37.9%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.3 ptsWriter: 37.3%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.