Author summary
79% 21 analyzed articles/videos 10,769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 7,701 hits . Analysis detected 52,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,436 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,378 of 8,789 authors). This Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling
Author details
Total words: 44,436
Article count: 21
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score21 analyzed articles44.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst