Author summary
61%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cristina Laila results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 370 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 93% (706 of 9,471 authors). This Cristina Laila is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Cristina Laila
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
93%Cristina Laila (selected)7%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.4%28.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos