Topic summary
82% 20 analyzed articles/videos 9,361 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Earnings results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 2,763 hits . Analysis detected 33,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,985 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 33% (16,596 of 24,545 topics). This Corporate Earnings is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Corporate Earnings
Topic details
Total words: 37,985
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score20 analyzed articles38K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst