Author summary
6%5 analyzed articles/videos10,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Roach results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 877 hits. Analysis detected 10,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,370 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,422 of 8,536 authors). This Jake Roach is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Jake Roach
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
2%Jake Roach (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 33,370
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.3% percentile
0.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles33.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate