Author summary
56% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dade Hayes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 921 hits . Analysis detected 5,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,500 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 39% (5,242 of 8,520 authors). This Dade Hayes is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Dade Hayes
Author details
Total words: 8,500
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst