Publication summary
47% 78 analyzed articles/videos 34,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deadline results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 8,614 hits . Analysis detected 94,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 149,977 analyzed words across 78 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 34% (363 of 548 publications). This Deadline is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 149,977
Article count: 78
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score78 analyzed articles150K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst