Author summary
53% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Goldbart results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,363 hits . Analysis detected 11,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,700 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 34% (5,869 of 8,822 authors). This Max Goldbart is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Max Goldbart
Author details
Total words: 15,700
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst