Author summary
29%3 analyzed articles/videos1,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nellie Andreeva results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 2,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,564 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,043 of 8,546 authors). This Nellie Andreeva is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Nellie Andreeva
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
41%Nellie Andreeva (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,564
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos