Author summary
53%3 analyzed articles/videos1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Evans results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 3,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,632 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,703 of 8,524 authors). This Greg Evans is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Greg Evans
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
45%Greg Evans (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,632
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate