Publication summary
41% 84 analyzed articles/videos 56,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Insider results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 11,758 hits . Analysis detected 159,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 285,066 analyzed words across 84 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 25% (415 of 548 publications). This Business Insider is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 285,066
Article count: 84
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 1.0% BS Score84 analyzed articles285.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst