Author summary
49%2 analyzed articles/videos605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lakshmi Varanasi results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 594 hits. Analysis detected 6,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,156 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,519 of 8,521 authors). This Lakshmi Varanasi is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Lakshmi Varanasi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
36%Lakshmi Varanasi (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,156
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate