Author summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 1,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sinéad Baker results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Bandwagon , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,163 hits . Analysis detected 5,478 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,444 of 8,520 authors). This Sinéad Baker is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Sinéad Baker
Author details
Total words: 6,276
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 18.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst