Author summary
86% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Loh results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,745 hits . Analysis detected 12,394 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,396 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,047 of 8,521 authors). This Matthew Loh is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Matthew Loh
Author details
Total words: 13,396
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst