Author summary
74% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Epstein results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,917 hits . Analysis detected 22,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,480 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,733 of 8,541 authors). This Jake Epstein is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Jake Epstein
Author details
Total words: 25,480
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles25.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst