Author summary
79%3 analyzed articles/videos1,629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Leslie results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,362 hits. Analysis detected 10,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,440 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,398 of 9,524 authors). This Robert Leslie is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Robert Leslie
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
65%Robert Leslie (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,440
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.2%12.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate