I bought a one-way ticket to Shanghai, thinking I'd stay for a year. 12 years later, it feels like home. 16%

By Sophie Steiner19%

8/2/2026, 4:47:01 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 959 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.9% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,067 of 26,282 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the article peer group.

Graeme Kennedy knew he didn't want to stay in Canada but never expected to spend the next decade in China. 
Provided by Graeme Kennedy 
Graeme Kennedy left a small town in Canada for Shanghai, expecting to stay one year. 
He quit marketing, built a photography business, and now documents food and culture. 
Now, he's lived in Shanghai for 12 years and says it's where he feels most at home. 
This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Graeme Kennedy, a Canadian photographer based in Shanghai. 
His words have been edited for length and clarity. 
I grew up in a small town in the Canadian Rockies in the kind of place where you help your neighbor shovel snow off their sidewalk just because. 
My childhood was spent climbing trees, biking, and skiing. 
Sadly, the nature that drew in tourists year-round was lost on me. 
I wanted to get out of that 4,000-person town. 
Have you relocated abroad  especially to Asia  for career opportunities, retirement, or lower living costs? 
We want to hear from you. 
Fill out this short form to share your story with a reporter. 
At 18, I moved to Thailand to work in a school's marketing department, then to London for two years, and finally, in a bold leap, to Shanghai in 2014. 
Despite my narrow understanding of China , fueled by the politically-charged headlines that often painted a gray picture, I bought a one-way ticket. 
My first five years in Shanghai were spent in marketing and creative direction for a British international school and a luxury hospitality company. 
It was stable work, but I felt a growing discontent. 
The allure of China's vastness extended far beyond the confines of a 9-to-6 office desk. 
Photography had always been my passion, a key that opened doors and offered glimpses into the lives of others. 
It had provided me with an excuse to travel with purpose and engage with the world more deeply. 
Whether photographing mushroom harvesting in Lishui or documenting cacao production in Tanzania, each click of the shutter drew me closer to understanding life's complexities. 
My motto, "Just say yes," became a guiding principle. 
Kennedy taking photos at a duck farm in Beijing. 
Provided by Greame Kennedy 
I never studied photography; I taught myself. 
Whether I was shooting for a school newspaper or creating day-to-day content for a marketing department, photography was always connected to the work I was doing. 
I just never thought it could be a career. 
During my last full-time job, I started taking on photography work on the side to make some extra money. 
I'd done a few shoots on weekends and evenings, but without a business, I couldn't legally accept payments. 
Starting a company felt daunting, but I eventually realized the rewards outweighed the risks. 
In 2019, I launched my own photography company. 
I made very little at first, but once everything was set up, I could finally accept payments from clients who had been waiting to pay me. 
That gave me enough to get through the first couple of months. 
When he started his career in photography, he took on almost any project he could get. 
Provided by Graeme Kennedy 
At first, I was earning less than 20,000 RMB a month  barely enough to cover rent, food, and new camera gear. 
I took almost any project I could get, often for free, shooting friends' restaurants, events, gyms, and bars. 
The goal wasn't to make a lot of money right away. 
It was to build a portfolio , stay busy, and earn referrals. 
Within a year, those connections and the work I put in led to bigger jobs. 
Working for myself has meant slow months, expensive months, and windfall months. 
There were anxious nights waiting for payments so I could pay my staff, but it was never just about making money. 
The chaos is mine to be proud of. 
I get to travel, set my own schedule, and know that the effort I put in benefits me directly. 
Finding stories through food 
Even though I'm more involved in the business side these days, I still love being a photographer. 
Food has become a big focus of my work. 
My mom was a dietitian, so I grew up appreciating the stories behind what we eat. 
To me, food isn't just something you consume  it says a lot about a culture and a community. 
I'm fascinated by everything that goes into making local dishes, from the people growing the ingredients to the kitchens where they're prepared. 
That's what motivates my photography. 
Kennedy started a documentary series with Christopher St. 
Cavish. 
Provided by Graeme Kennedy 
I recently co-started the "SaintCavish" YouTube documentary series with a writer, Christopher St. 
Cavish, which, despite bootstrapping on a tight budget with a crew of under five people, got nominated for a James Beard Award. 
People in the West are curious about China . 
When our first season got 15 million views, we knew we were onto something. 
Looking back, I've realized that home isn't as straightforward as I once thought. 
For people who live overseas, it's shaped by the experiences you have, the people around you, and how you change over time. 
When I first moved to Shanghai, I thought I'd only stay for a year. 
Yet a decade later, I still have the keys to an apartment in Shanghai . 
I've put down roots here, surrounded by a community of creatives and entrepreneurs who have become like family. 
I visit my family in Canada from time to time, but Shanghai is where I feel most at home. 
Read the original article on Business Insider 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.2%Sophie Steiner: 3.0%Business Insider: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Sophie Steiner: 2.1%Business Insider: 2.8%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 4.3%Sophie Steiner: 1.1%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 3.4%Sophie Steiner: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 2.4%Sophie Steiner: 0.6%Business Insider: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias2.4%This article: 2.7%Sophie Steiner: 0.7%Business Insider: 3.8%Framing Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.8%Sophie Steiner: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.8%This article: 6.4%Sophie Steiner: 1.6%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect6.4%This article: 8.6%Sophie Steiner: 3.6%Business Insider: 2.8%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 0.9%Sophie Steiner: 0.2%Business Insider: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.9%This article: 4.5%Sophie Steiner: 1.7%Business Insider: 4.1%Negativity Bias4.5%This article: 9.2%Sophie Steiner: 3.4%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Sophie Steiner: 0.7%Business Insider: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 0.9%Sophie Steiner: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.9%This article: 4.6%Sophie Steiner: 2.1%Business Insider: 2.5%Halo Effect4.6%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.2%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.5%Business Insider: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.8%Business Insider: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 1.8%Sophie Steiner: 0.4%Business Insider: 1.1%False Dilemma1.8%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.0%This article: 5.3%Sophie Steiner: 2.1%Business Insider: 3.4%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.5%Sophie Steiner: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.6%Bandwagon1.5%This article: 5.2%Sophie Steiner: 1.3%Business Insider: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.3%Sophie Steiner: 1.3%Business Insider: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.7%Sophie Steiner: 0.7%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division2.7%This article: 15.4%Sophie Steiner: 4.5%Business Insider: 3.1%Anecdotal15.4%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Sophie Steiner: 0.7%Business Insider: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.7%Sophie Steiner: 0.4%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy1.7%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.9%Sophie Steiner: 0.7%Business Insider: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice2.9%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sophie Steiner: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Sophie Steiner: 0.3%Business Insider: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.3%

959 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.9%attributed speech922writer words
Selected voice

Graeme Kennedy

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words100% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Graeme Kennedy: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Graeme Kennedy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.