Topic summary
⁠91%4 analyzed articles/videos2,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Culture results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 2,425 hits. Analysis detected 16,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,581 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,509 of 22,022 topics). This Food Culture is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Food Culture
Topic details
Total words: 9,581
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 20.6%20.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 25.3%25.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos