Publication summary
93% 525 analyzed articles/videos 432,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goats and Soda (NPR) results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 192,268 hits . Analysis detected 1,649,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710,213 analyzed words across 524 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 57% (248 of 564 publications). This Goats and Soda (NPR) is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Goats and Soda (NPR)
Publication details
Total words: 1,710,213
Article count: 524
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score524 analyzed articles1.7M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst