Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Sobiloff results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 1,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,726 of 9,471 authors). This Beth Sobiloff is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Beth Sobiloff
Author details
Total words: 2,588
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% No True Scotsman: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst