I've never lived anywhere longer than 5 years. Being the perpetual new girl has its pros and cons. 16%

By Chloe Gordon Cordover20%

8/3/2026, 5:39:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 850 faulty-reasoning hits from 901 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,166 of 26,281 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the article peer group.

The author has never lived anywhere longer than five years. 
Courtesy of Chloe Gordon Cordover 
I'm 30, and I've never lived anywhere longer than five years. 
We moved a lot because of my dad's job, and I continued moving frequently on my own after college. 
I feel as though I have wide, rather than deep, roots. 
At 30, the longest I've ever lived somewhere is five years. 
That's one year longer than the time I spent in college , which for most people is probably the shortest time they've lived in one place. 
I've lived in 10 cities, seven states, and more houses than I feel like counting, and when people ask where I'm from, unlike when they ask me about the weather, there is depth to the question. 
So much so that my answer varies depending on the person who's asking. 
I've moved all over, first for my dad's job, then of my own accord 
If I know I'll never see you again, you get " Birmingham, Alabama ," my birthplace, quick and easy. 
If the conversation is casual, you get "all over the South," which is technically true and also conversationally merciful. 
But sometimes I'll say, "It's a long list, but I'm happy to share." 
And if you say yes, I tell you to sit down before I walk through it all: Birmingham, then Nashville, then Dothan, then the Florida panhandle, then Louisville, then Denver, then Boulder for college, then Birmingham again, then New Orleans, and now Savannah, Georgia, where I'm three years into what is only a five-year stint, due to my husband's career . 
After this, we'll move somewhere else for one to three years, and then after that, maybe, we'll settle down. 
That answer is always followed by the next question: "Why did you move so often?" 
Like most kids, I knew my dad's job only in the vaguest terms: real estate lawyer. 
What he actually does all day is still a mystery to me. 
I understood, in the general sense, that his career was built on helping businesses grow or closing them, Blockbuster among them. 
But when people asked, I'd just reply with, "My dad's job, and, no, not military." 
Quick and easy. 
The first time I moved was when I was 3, and then again at 6. 
Our next move was when I was in fifth grade, and then twice in high school. 
I kept the pattern going myself when I moved to college, and then moved in with my grandfather after I graduated. 
I then followed my now husband to New Orleans, Louisiana, for his medical school training, and then to Savannah, Georgia, to begin his medical career. 
The author moved throughout her childhood because of her dad's career and, in adulthood, has continued to move frequently. 
Courtesy of Chloe Gordon Cordover 
Having wide roots has its pros and cons 
I don't have deep roots. 
I have wide ones. 
They spread laterally, under state lines and across regions, through rivers and streams, and over mountains, which is why it's rare for me to meet someone without finding a thread between us. 
Being the perpetual new girl taught me to walk into any room feeling unafraid, but also to be slow to interrupt the existing flow. 
Of course, wide roots can't do everything deep ones can. 
I am nobody's oldest friend. 
There is no one outside my family who has known me since before I knew myself, no neighbor who watched me learn to ride a bike and can hold that version of me up against the current one. 
Every friendship I have started in the middle of my story. 
When you move every few years, you get very good at beginnings and ends and very little practice at the middle. 
I've often wondered which are more meaningful, wide roots or deep ones. 
But I think it's hard to compare. 
People ask if I've liked moving, and the honest answer is that I don't know anything else. 
My birthday is on Christmas Day , and I get the same curiosity about whether I like that. 
But I've never had a birthday that wasn't wrapped in the joy of a holiday, and I've never had a hometown that wasn't temporary, whether I knew it at the time or not. 
But I do know that the life I've lived has given me an education in the small, stubborn differences between places outsiders assume are identical. 
One Southern city says "y'all" while another, improbably, says "you guys." 
Boiled peanuts are a religion in one town and a soggy nut in the next. 
Tiny things, sure, but it's where a hometown keeps its personality, and learning to notice them and the bigger nuances has made me both more interested and, I hope, more interesting. 
Sometimes I try to imagine what it would be like to have lived in just one city, in just one house, with the same friends from kindergarten through graduation. 
But I fear that version of me might be boring and close-minded, unexposed to different cultures, people, and places. 
I'd trade every deep root I don't have before I'd trade the width of the ones I do. 
So, have I liked moving? 
Yes, because it's made me who I am. 
Read the original article on Business Insider 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 1.4%Business Insider: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 1.4%Business Insider: 0.6%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 7.7%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.4%Business Insider: 2.8%Availability Heuristic7.7%This article: 5.9%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.6%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.9%Business Insider: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.5%Business Insider: 3.8%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 2.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.7%Loss Aversion2.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.1%Business Insider: 2.8%Optimism Bias4.9%This article: 2.1%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.5%Business Insider: 1.4%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 4.2%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.1%Business Insider: 4.1%Negativity Bias4.2%This article: 3.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.3%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias3.0%This article: 2.7%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 1.7%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.7%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.9%Business Insider: 2.5%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 1.7%Business Insider: 1.1%Recency Bias6.8%This article: 3.7%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.9%Business Insider: 0.3%Primacy Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.1%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.8%Business Insider: 1.1%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.8%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 5.9%Business Insider: 3.4%Hasty Generalization8.8%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.5%Business Insider: 2.6%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.8%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.4%Business Insider: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 2.7%Business Insider: 3.1%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.6%Business Insider: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.4%Business Insider: 1.0%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 2.1%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.5%Business Insider: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 3.2%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 1.3%Business Insider: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice3.2%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Chloe Gordon Cordover: 0.2%Business Insider: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.8%

901 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.