Author summary
80% 118 analyzed articles/videos 78,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Durden results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 34,890 hits . Analysis detected 372,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 329,294 analyzed words across 118 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,764 of 8,525 authors). This Tyler Durden is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Tyler Durden
Author details
Total words: 329,294
Article count: 118
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score118 analyzed articles329.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst