Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Silberling results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 180 hits . Analysis detected 1,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,853 of 8,806 authors). This Amanda Silberling is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Amanda Silberling
Author details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst