Publication summary
68%120 analyzed articles/videos75,891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TechCrunch results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 18,766 hits. Analysis detected 247,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 334,797 analyzed words across 120 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 41% (327 of 548 publications). This TechCrunch is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
TechCrunch
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
41%TechCrunch (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
1.4% BS Score120 analyzed articles334.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate