Author summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos1,521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Park results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 747 hits. Analysis detected 5,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,084 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (3,718 of 9,122 authors). This Kate Park is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Kate Park
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠60%Kate Park (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,084
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos