Author summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos1,597 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic-Madori Davis results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 773 hits. Analysis detected 5,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,704 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (4,937 of 8,521 authors). This Dominic-Madori Davis is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Dominic-Madori Davis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
43%Dominic-Madori Davis (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,704
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos