Author summary
38% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aisha Malik results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,277 hits . Analysis detected 7,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,416 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,108 of 8,802 authors). This Aisha Malik is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Aisha Malik
Author details
Total words: 12,416
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst