Author summary
79% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Bort results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,150 hits . Analysis detected 16,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,408 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (4,817 of 8,764 authors). This Julie Bort is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Julie Bort
Author details
Total words: 15,408
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst