Publication summary
78% 102 analyzed articles/videos 60,634 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows Central results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 32,589 hits . Analysis detected 254,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 283,826 analyzed words across 102 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (255 of 581 publications). This Windows Central is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 283,826
Article count: 102
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score102 analyzed articles283.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 11.5% 11.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst