Author summary
27%7 analyzed articles/videos6,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mauro Huculak results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 1,641 hits. Analysis detected 13,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,532 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 6% (8,369 of 8,826 authors). This Mauro Huculak is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Mauro Huculak
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
6%Mauro Huculak (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 32,532
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751005.2% percentile
1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles32.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate