Speaker summary
84%9 analyzed articles/videos1,244.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl DeMaio results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 4,164.135 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (36,463 of 39,201 speakers). This Carl DeMaio is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Carl DeMaio
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
7%Carl DeMaio (selected)8%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score9 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.9%31.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate