Author summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Fleischman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 473 hits . Analysis detected 3,055 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,086 of 8,706 authors). This Jon Fleischman is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Jon Fleischman
Author details
Total words: 3,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.5% 7.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst