Publication summary
91% 42 analyzed articles/videos 20,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daily Signal results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 14,256 hits . Analysis detected 166,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 134,581 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 72% (159 of 549 publications). This Daily Signal is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 134,581
Article count: 42
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score42 analyzed articles134.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst