Author summary
96% 42 analyzed articles/videos 17,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Curtis results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 16,162 hits . Analysis detected 134,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 73,731 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (2,287 of 9,212 authors). This Amy Curtis is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Amy Curtis
Author details
Total words: 73,731
Article count: 42
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score42 analyzed articles73.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 21.3% 21.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.9% 21.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 21.3%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst