Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 314 Action Fund results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (5 of 39,040 speakers). This 314 Action Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
314 Action Fund
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠100%314 Action Fund (selected)100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

100% percentile
0255075100100.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos