Author summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christine Mai-Duc results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 801 hits . Analysis detected 8,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (6,478 of 8,706 authors). This Christine Mai-Duc is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Christine Mai-Duc
Author details
Total words: 12,392
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst