Keyword summary
88% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 3,659 hits . Analysis detected 22,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,188 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (25,368 of 57,989 keywords). This Tucson is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group. Tucson
Keyword details
Total words: 22,188
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.3% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst