Author summary
90% 39 analyzed articles/videos 50,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Bussey results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 24,535 hits . Analysis detected 180,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 209,772 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (6,481 of 8,826 authors). This Emma Bussey is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Emma Bussey
Author details
Total words: 209,772
Article count: 39
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score39 analyzed articles209.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst