Author summary
65% 16 analyzed articles/videos 16,322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Fry results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 5,464 hits . Analysis detected 44,743 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,879 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,062 of 8,710 authors). This Hannah Fry is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Hannah Fry
Author details
Total words: 65,879
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles65.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst