Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 1,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jazmin Alvarado results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 2,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,231 of 8,771 authors). This Jazmin Alvarado is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Jazmin Alvarado
Author details
Total words: 4,868
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Middle Ground: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst